Oasis Discussions

Does periodontal treatment matter for periodontitis patients with cardiovascular disease?

This summary is based on the article publishedin the Journal of Clinical Periodontology: Treatment of periodontitis improves the atherosclerotic profile: a systematic review and meta-analysis (January 2014)

Wijnand J. Teeuw, Dagmar E. Slot, Hendri Susanto, Victor E. A. Gerdes, Frank Abbas, Francesco D’Aiuto, John J. P. Kastelein and Bruno G. Loos

Context

Periodontitis is a common chronic multifactorial infectious disease of the supporting structures of the teeth (root cementum, periodontal ligament and alveolar bone) and a major cause of tooth loss.

Several causal mechanisms have been proposed whereby bacterial pathogens, antigens, endotoxins, and/or inflammatory cytokines from periodontal lesions in the oral cavity contribute to the process of atherogenesis as well as to thromboembolic events and thereby increase the risk for cardiovascular disease (1, 2).

Treatment of periodontitis includes mechanical removal of supra- and subgingival bacterial plaque deposits and intensive oral hygiene instructions. Regularly, periodontal surgery is needed to reduce or eliminate residual periodontitis lesions.

Purpose of the Review

The systematic review of clinical intervention trials was performed to assess the question whether periodontal treatment affects the cardiovascular risk profile in periodontitis patients compared to no treatment, taking inter-trial differences into account.

Key Findings

References

  1. Humphrey, L. L., Fu, R., Buckley, D. I., Freeman, M. & Helfand, M. (2008) Periodontal disease and coronary heart disease incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 23, 2079–2086.
  2. Friedewald, V. E., Kornman, K. S., Beck, J. D., Genco, R., Goldfine, A., Libby, P., Offenbacher, S., Ridker, P. M., Van Dyke, T. E. & Roberts, W. C. (2009) The American Journal of Cardiology and Journal of Periodontology Editors’ Consensus: periodontitis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. American Journal of Cardiology 104, 59–68.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *