This summary is based on the article published in Advances in Dental Research: Light Therapy: Complementary Antibacterial Treatment of Oral Biofilm (September 2012)
Context
Conventional antibacterial treatment fails to eradicate biofilms associated with common infections of the oral cavity. Unlike chemical agents, which are less effective than anticipated, owing to diffusion limitations in biofilms, light is more effective on bacteria in biofilm than in suspension. Effectiveness depends also on the type and parameters of the light.
Purpose of the Article
To present a rational selection of the specific types of light to be used. The article presents recent studies and novel work on the effects of two different types of light sources with different mechanisms of action: non-coherent blue light (wavelengths, 400-500 nm) and CO2 laser (wavelength, 10.6 μm), on S. mutans biofilm and on enamel covered by biofilm. The article focuses on the potential of such irradiation to serve as a complementary antibacterial treatment for oral biofilms associated with caries disease.
Key Messages
Do you have any particular question on this topic? Do you have any comments or suggestions? Email us at oasisdiscussions@cda-adc.ca
You are invited to comment on this post and provide further insights by posting in the comment box which you will find by clicking on “Post a reply” below. You are welcome to remain anonymous and your email address will not be posted.