Oasis Discussions

Dealing with “unacceptably inconsistent” advice on toothbrushing

This summary is based on the article published in the British Dental Journal:  An analysis of methods of toothbrushing recommended by dental associations, toothpaste and toothbrush companies and in dental texts (August 2014)

J. Wainwright and A. Sheiham

Context

Universally, dentists, dental associations  and government bodies recommend regular daily toothbrushing because it is  so important for preventing periodontal  disease and caries. One would expect some professional consensus on which methods of toothbrushing to recommend.

Evaluations on  the effectiveness of dental health education indicate that adherence to recommendations on toothbrushing are not good. This may be related to the fact that the methods of  toothbrushing recommended are either too difficult to perform or conflict with what  patients have learned from other authorities  or adverts for toothpastes.

Purpose of the Study

To assess the methods of toothbrushing recommended for both adults and children by dental associations, toothpaste and toothbrush companies and professional sources, such as in dental textbooks and by experts. Secondly, to compare the advice by source and whether recommendations differed for adults and for children.

The study:

Key Findings

 

Do you have any particular question on this topic? Do you have any comments or suggestions? Email us at oasisdiscussions@cda-adc.ca

You are invited to comment on this post and provide further insights by posting in the comment box which you will find by clicking on “Post a reply” below. You are welcome to remain anonymous and your email address will not be posted.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *