Oasis Discussions

Is there evidence favouring one irrigant over another irrigant in root canal treatments?

This Systematic Review Summary is adapted from the British Evidence-Based Dentistry Journal

Full Text (html)

Full Text (PDF)

Clinical Question

What are the effects of irrigants used in the non-surgical root canal treatment of mature permanent teeth?

Main Results

Eleven trials (851 participants, 879 teeth) were included. Six trials were assessed at high risk of bias, three unclear and two low. Four compared sodium hypochlorite versus chlorhexidine, the other trials compared different interventions and only two of these trials included useable data on the primary outcomes of swelling and pain. Meta-analysis of sodium hypochlorite versus chlorhexidine indicated no strong evidence of a difference in the existence of bacterial growth between the interventions (risk ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.34 to 1.56; P = 0.41). None of the included trials reported any data on adverse effects nor radiological changes in periapical radiolucency.

Conclusion

 

Do you need further information on this topict? Do you have any comments or suggestions? Email us at oasisdiscussions@cda-adc.ca

Your are invited to comment on this post and provide further insights by posting in the comment box which you will find by clicking on “Leave a reply“ below. You are welcome to remain anonymous and your email address will not be posted.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *