LOADING

Type to search

Supporting Your Practice

View from the Chairside: Don’t Rush to Judgment, a Molar Falsely Accused

Share

Dr. Paul Belzycki is back with a case of a molar that was almost lost to rush judgment. In his presentations, Dr. Belzycki generously shares four decades of extensive clinical experience, striving to provide excellent quality oral care. In addition, you will find below a few pieces of valuable advice for new and young dentists on how to succeed professionally and practice to the best of their abilities. 

As usual we are very grateful and thankful for his valuable contribution and continued support.

I hope you enjoy watching the case. We always welcome your feedback, thoughts, suggestions, and questions. Email us at oasisdsicussions@cda-adc.ca or if you would like to call us, our toll-free number is 1-855-716-2747.

Until next time!

Chiraz Guessaier, CDA Oasis Manager

Dr. Belzycki’s Thoughts

A patient is deserving of an accurate diagnosis. In the absence of an accurate diagnosis, treatment is useless at best and dangerous at worst, if it is invasive. Consider if you had to undergo unnecessary surgery, how would you feel? 

There are several steps required to reach an accurate diagnosis. First and foremost, you need a thorough understanding of the clinical problem you are dealing with. When in doubt, do not act and consider that there is no shame in referring to colleagues who possess more clinical expertise, or in waiting for symptoms to become more site specific, if they are ill-defined on initial assessment.

Second, don’t rush and take your time. Sometimes, clinical problems are routine and quickly recognizable. Other times, they are obscure and they require lengthy appointments. So, use appropriate radiographs and conduct thorough clinical investigations to reach a closest-to-accurate diagnosis.

Third, give the patient the benefit of the doubt, if they describe sensations you deem not possible, mysterious, or trivial.

Finally, always consider that you may be mistaken!

Read/download the transcript of the full presentation (PDF)

Read/download the transcript of Here’s to Young Dentists (PDF)

Oasis Moment (2.41″)

Full Case Presentation (32.23″)

Here’s to New Dentists (8.01″)

 

3 Comments

  1. Anonymous November 14, 2018

    Young dentist chiming in here. Good work altogether. Just some questions that popped up while viewing the presentation:

    1) Why not raise a flap and evaluate to see the extent of the fracture prior to starting endo?

    2) I see that a periapical was used to assess CEJ decay? Should not a bitewing be used? I find it difficult to believe that a 70y/o female patient with seemingly good hygiene gets decay localized to just the mesial aspect of a second molar – but I guess it happens.

    Reply
  2. Lisa November 14, 2018

    Thank you for sharing this. Always a good reminder to assess and diagnose accurately. And wonderful work. My question is: the X-ray did not show that palatal root of 26 fully, in case there is apical lesion? Being calcified and necrotic tooth and maybe apical lesion would you have considered doing that root canal as 2 appointments with diapex in between to kill all bacteria? Or in your experience doesn’t make a difference?

    Reply
    1. Dr. Paul Belzycki, DDS November 15, 2018

      Dear Lisa, thanks for taking the time to contribute.

      The initial PA shown was taken at a flat angle similar to that of a BW because I wanted a distortion-free image to assess the pulp chamber and canals. I anticipated being short of the apex on that film. This did not concern me because I knew I would take additional films as endodontic therapy progressed.

      Please note that given the time constraints of these presentations, I cannot present in great detail all the steps of the diagnosis and conversation with the patient. Suffice it to say that I knew that the tooth was not necrotic because there was no prior history of decay, trauma or past restorations. There was no history of symptoms related to thermal cycling or spontaneous pain nor swelling. Once the fracture segment was removed, the patient experienced no pain to pressure or percussion. The symptoms were solely related to the fractured segment. This diagnosis could not have been simpler.

      Unfortunately, I had to proceed with endo because the prior dentist had entered into the chamber. There was no foul odour or fluids indicative of infection. Merely tight canals with a little bit of blood due to live tissue. Hence, I felt comfortable doing the case in one appt. I did not state that this tooth was necrotic. Further, the degree of calcification was manageable. There are instances when calcification makes endo near impossible. Again, all cases have their unique clinical peculiarities.

      With regards to necrotic teeth, I have no set rules as to one or multiple appointments. Often it is a gut feeling. If dealing with no soft tissue swelling, a single wide canal where irrigation with Sodium Hypochlorite is feasible and where I can dry the canal easily, then I may elect to complete in one appointment.

      With swelling, pain, and multiple canals that remain wet due to drainage from the apex, I prefer to use Calcium Hydroxide paste between appointments and complete when symptoms subside in the presence of dry, clean canals. I do not rush these cases.

      In my experience, I find EVERYTHING MATTERS !!!!

      Thanks again for your participation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: