This post was prepared in collaboration with Carestream
On an experimental basis, we have asked a limited number of companies to provide us with practical “How To” answers to clinical questions. We were prompted to conduct this experiment when dental team members told us that they visit company websites and consult company representatives for practical clinical information. We look forward to receiving your feedback on this experiment.
A healthy male patient presented at my office seeking an implant to replace the maxillary left central incisor (# 9).His general dentist had extracted the tooth and performed a socket bone graft and the patient felt more comfortable having a specialist place the implant. The patient was eager to begin treatment and was confident he had enough bone. Indeed, the initial clinical exam also gave me the impression of plenty of bone (Fig. 1).
Although it initially appeared that there was adequate ridge width, a computed tomography (CT) image (Fig. 2) revealed that the ridge was deficient; it was resorbed and too palatal. A cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image captured with the CS 9300 confirmed that the previous socket bone graft was unsuccessful, leading to vertical and horizontal bone deficiency (Fig. 3).
The extracted tooth crown had been bonded to the adjacent teeth by the general dentist. Also, the bonded crown had a portion of the root included, making it too long.
The defect was exposed (Fig. 4) and the site grafted with autograft harvested from the site with an AMC bur (Fig. 5). The area was then augmented with BioOss (Fig. 6) and the site was covered with Ossix Plus collagen membrane (Fig. 7). A post-op cone beam CT scan was taken to confirm the success of the graft (Fig. 8). The graft healed very well and the patient was pleased with the results. So pleased, in fact, that he posted a rave review on the practice Facebook page.