Posterior Partial Coverage Restorations: how fracture resistant and what is the risk of failure?
This summary is based on the article published in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry: Evaluation of fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations (April 2013)
The interest in posterior partial coverage restorations has increased because these restorations provide a more conservative treatment option than traditional cohesively based restorations; however, material selection has been a controversial topic in the current literature.
Purpose of the Study
To evaluate the fracture resistance of posterior partial coverage restorations restored with different materials, examine their stress distribution, and calculate failure risks using three-dimensional (3D) ﬁnite element analysis.
Fracture resistance and failure risks of posterior partial coverage restorations are signiﬁcantly inﬂuenced by material selection.
- Many restorative materials have been advocated for partial coverage restorations. It is essential to ensure that restorative materials have sufﬁcient strength to support occlusal forces and, in case of fracture, the remaining tooth structure is not compromised or placed at risk.
- The study revealed that all-ceramic materials had high incidences of fractures involving the materials themselves, whereas the predominant failure of resin-based composite involved the tooth structure in a catastrophic manner.
Do you have any particular question on this topic? Do you have any comments or suggestions? Email us at firstname.lastname@example.org
You are invited to comment on this post and provide further insights by posting in the comment box which you will find by clicking on “Post a reply“ below. You are welcome to remain anonymous and your email address will not be posted.