This summary is based on the article published in the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry: Clinical outcomes of implant abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review (June 2013)
Current paradigms for treatment success in implant dentistry are based not only on true clinical outcomes, such as implant survival, restoration survival, and patient satisfaction but also on surrogate clinical outcomes such as dentogingival esthetics, rate of mechanical complications, bone levels, and health of surrounding soft tissues. This is especially important for implant therapy in maxillary and mandibular anterior regions, where esthetics play a predominant role in treatment success.
Purpose of the Study
- The clinical outcomes of anterior implant abutments are not well reported.
- Systematically review the existing literature to identify survival, mechanical, biological, and esthetic outcomes of anterior implant abutments.
- Minimal anterior abutment fractures have been reported and are restricted to ceramic abutments.
- Studies using spectrophotometry showed lesser gingival discoloration with zirconia abutments, but there is no evidence for difference in patient’s esthetic satisfaction between ceramic and metal abutments.
- For the anterior region, selection of an implant with internal connection and a customized metal abutment (titanium or cast metal) can have the least mechanical complications.
- Limited existing clinical data indicate reduced peri-implant mucosal discoloration from zirconia abutments, which may be preferable over metal abutments, in patients with thinner mucosal tissues or patients with high or gummy smiles.
Do you have any particular question on this topic? Do you have any comments or suggestions? Email us at email@example.com
You are invited to comment on this post and provide further insights by posting in the comment box which you will find by clicking on “Post a reply“ below. You are welcome to remain anonymous and your email address will not be posted.